23
Numbers

Balaam’s Second Oracle

Numbers 23:13-26
13Balak said to him, 'Come, go with me, please, to another place from which you will see him. You will see only his end, and you will not see all of him; and curse him for me from there.' 14He took him to the field of Zophim, to the head of Pisgah, and he built seven altars and offered a bullock and a ram on the altar. 15He said to Balak, 'Stand here beside your burnt offering, and I will meet here.' 16The LORD met Balaam and placed a word in his mouth, and he said, 'Return to Balak and speak thus.' 17He came to him, and there he was, standing beside his burnt offering with the rulers of Moab; and Balak said to him, 'What has the LORD spoken?' 18He lifted his proverb and said, 'Rise, Balak, and hear; listen to me, son of Zippor.' 19God is not a man that he should lie, nor a son of man that he should repent; has he spoken and will he not do it, or spoken and will he not fulfill it? 20Behold, I have received blessing and he has blessed, and I will not revoke it. 21He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, nor has he seen trouble in Israel; the LORD his God is with him, and the shout of a king is among them. 22God brings them out of Egypt; he is to them like the horns of a wild ox. 23For there is no divination in Jacob and no divination in Israel; at this time it will be said to Jacob and to Israel, 'What has God done?' 24Behold, a people rises like a lion and lifts itself like a lion; it will not lie down until it devours the prey and drinks the blood of the slain. 25Balak said to Balaam, 'Neither curse him nor bless him.' 26Balaam answered and said to Balak, 'Did I not tell you that I must do whatever the LORD speaks?'

Key words in this passage

In this passage

People

Cross-references

Study notes

Balak's effort to steer the divine word by changing vantage point and repeating sacrifices meets repeated frustration. The LORD places a fresh message in Balaam's mouth that declares God neither lies nor repents once he has spoken. Blessing already received stands firm, and no iniquity or trouble appears when the LORD looks upon Jacob. Instead, divine presence and exodus power equip the people for an unstoppable advance. Balak's command to cease both cursing and blessing cannot override the constraint that Balaam must speak whatever the LORD supplies.

What is Balaam’s Second Oracle about?

Balak brings Balaam to the field of Zophim on the head of Pisgah after the first attempt at cursing Israel has already failed. He asks Balaam to view only the end of the people from this new vantage point and to pronounce a curse from there. Seven fresh altars are prepared, and the same pattern of sacrifice is repeated while Balak stands beside the offering with the rulers of Moab.

The central tension lies in Balak’s repeated effort to secure a divine word against Israel and Balaam’s consistent reply that he can speak only what the LORD places in his mouth. When the LORD meets Balaam again and sends him back with a fresh message, Balak’s question “What has the LORD spoken?” receives an answer that once more turns the hoped-for curse into an announcement of blessing.

These verses therefore matter because they show the immediate continuation of the struggle between a Moabite king’s political aims and the LORD’s refusal to alter the word already given concerning Jacob. The second oracle arises directly from this new location and the same ritual setting, making clear that the outcome does not depend on vantage point or number of sacrifices.

Where does this passage sit in Numbers?

After the first oracle in the preceding verses, Balak shifts tactics by moving Balaam to the field of Zophim on the head of Pisgah. He instructs Balaam to see only the end of the people and to curse from that new spot, repeating the construction of seven altars and the offering of a bullock and a ram. The same sacrificial pattern appears, yet the location change signals Balak’s hope that a restricted view might finally produce the desired word against Israel.

Balaam again directs Balak to stand beside the burnt offering while he meets the LORD. The encounter yields another message that Balak must hear, and when Balaam returns the question “What has the LORD spoken?” receives an answer that again converts the intended curse into blessing. The proverb form in verse 18 opens a sustained declaration that God does not lie or repent, that blessing has already been received and will not be revoked, and that no iniquity or trouble is found in Jacob because the LORD is with him.

This second round intensifies the earlier exchange. The repeated language of standing by the offering and reporting what the LORD has said shows the fixed pattern Balak cannot break. His closing demand that Balaam neither curse nor bless marks growing frustration, while Balaam’s reply echoes his earlier insistence that he must speak whatever the LORD places in his mouth. Within the larger account of Israel’s wilderness journey, these exchanges illustrate how attempts by surrounding rulers to oppose the people through hired speech are repeatedly overturned by the word the LORD supplies.

How is the passage structured?

Balak opens the section by proposing a shift to another vantage point on the head of Pisgah, where Balaam will see only the end of the camp rather than its full extent. The move is carried out at once, seven fresh altars are built, and the same offerings of bullock and ram are presented. Balaam then positions Balak beside the burnt offering and steps away to wait for the next word.

The LORD meets Balaam, supplies the message, and sends him back. Balak is found still standing with the rulers of Moab, and his first words upon Balaam’s return are the direct question, “What has the LORD spoken?” Balaam answers by lifting a proverb that begins with an address to Balak himself and then states that God does not lie or change his mind once he has spoken.

The proverb continues without interruption through five further lines: blessing has been received and will stand; no iniquity is seen in Jacob; the LORD is with the people; he brought them out of Egypt with the strength of a wild ox; and no divination is practiced among them. The final image presents Israel rising like a lion that will not rest until it has devoured its prey.

Balak breaks in with a new instruction: neither curse nor bless. Balaam replies by repeating the limit he had already stated earlier, that he must speak whatever the LORD places in his mouth. The exchange therefore closes on the same note of constraint that opened the first oracle, yet the content delivered between those markers has again turned into sustained blessing.

What is the historical background?

The field of Zophim on the head of Pisgah lies along a ridge in the Moabite highlands east of the Jordan. From this elevation an observer could look westward across the plains where Israel had encamped after its victories over Sihon and Og. Ancient Near Eastern peoples often treated such high places as favorable sites for seeking divine communication, believing that a clearer view of an enemy might strengthen a spoken word against them.

Balak’s decision to prepare seven fresh altars and repeat the offering of a bullock and a ram follows a recognizable pattern of ritual multiplication. In the surrounding cultures, increasing the number of sacrifices was understood as a way to secure a favorable response from the deity. The king stands beside the offerings together with the rulers of Moab, indicating that the rite was treated as a public and political act rather than a private consultation.

Balaam’s repeated claim that he can speak only the word the LORD places in his mouth reflects the tension between two different expectations. Balak hires him as a professional curser whose words were thought to carry independent power once the proper ritual conditions were met. Balaam, however, presents himself as one who must transmit whatever message he receives, regardless of the patron’s wishes. This distinction appears in the way the oracle itself contrasts Israel’s situation with the practices of divination common among its neighbors.

The reference to God bringing Israel out of Egypt and being present among them like the horns of a wild ox draws on older traditions of divine deliverance that Moabite hearers would have recognized as claims of protection and irresistible strength. Such language belonged to the shared cultural vocabulary of blessing and national identity in the region.

What does this passage teach about God?

Balak’s repeated instructions to Balaam expose a view of divine speech as something that can be steered by location and sacrifice. The LORD meets Balaam at the field of Zophim and places a fresh word in his mouth, showing that the message originates outside human control. When Balaam returns, he declares that God is not a man who lies or a son of man who repents. The statement anchors the reliability of what has already been spoken: once blessing has been received, it stands and will not be revoked.

The oracle then turns to what God sees in Israel. No iniquity is beheld in Jacob and no trouble is seen in Israel. This claim does not rest on Israel’s moral record but on the LORD’s presence with them and the shout of a king among them. The same God who brought the people out of Egypt now stands to them like the horns of a wild ox, an image of strength that moves forward without retreat. Because divination finds no foothold in Jacob or Israel, the only fitting question becomes what God has done.

The lion-like rising of the people follows directly from these affirmations. The description of devouring prey and drinking the blood of the slain underscores an unstoppable advance once the blessing is in force. Balak’s attempt to halt the process by forbidding both curse and blessing meets Balaam’s reply that he must speak whatever the LORD gives him. The exchange therefore leaves the divine word as the sole decisive factor, independent of the seer’s preferences or the king’s repeated offerings.

What are the interpretive difficulties?

Balak’s instruction in verse 13 that Balaam should see only the end of the people and not all of them raises a practical question about what he expects the change of location to accomplish. He moves Balaam to the field of Zophim on the head of Pisgah and repeats the full sequence of seven altars and sacrifices, yet the new vantage point produces another oracle of blessing rather than a curse. The text does not explain whether Balak thinks geography itself can alter the divine word or whether he simply hopes a different view will prompt a different message.

Balaam’s repeated claim that he must speak whatever the LORD places in his mouth appears in both oracles, but the second instance in verse 26 comes after Balak has already heard two blessings. The narrative leaves open how much pressure Balak believes he can still exert once the pattern of blessing has been established twice. Balak’s final request in verse 25, that Balaam neither curse nor bless, shows him shifting from demanding a curse to trying to silence the prophet altogether.

The oracle itself states that God has not beheld iniquity in Jacob and that the LORD his God is with him. Readers must decide how literally to take this claim within the larger story of Israel’s wilderness complaints. The passage does not resolve whether the statement describes Israel’s actual condition or functions as a declaration of divine protection despite Israel’s record. Similarly, the assertion that there is no divination in Jacob stands without further comment on the means by which Balaam himself receives his words.

One tension that remains unresolved is the relationship between Balak’s repeated sacrifices and the consistent outcome. The text records the offerings without indicating that they influence the message Balaam receives. The reader is left to weigh whether the narrative presents the sacrifices as ineffective ritual or simply as the expected setting in which Balaam seeks an encounter with the LORD.

Movement by movement

Balak Shifts the Location23:13-14

Balak proposes a move to another place from which Balaam will see only the end of the people and not all of him. The request keeps the same goal in view: a curse spoken against Israel. He leads Balaam to the field of Zophim on the head of Pisgah, where the ridge gives a narrower westward view across the plains. There the same preparations are made again, seven altars raised and a bullock and a ram offered on each. The repetition of the full sacrificial sequence shows that Balak treats the earlier failure as tied to the first vantage point rather than to any limit on what the LORD will allow. The text leaves open whether he believes the restricted sight itself will weaken the blessing already spoken or whether he simply hopes a fresh location will yield a different word. Either way, the action keeps the pattern of sacrifice and waiting intact while changing only the ground under Balaam’s feet.

The LORD Meets Balaam Again23:15-17

Balaam tells Balak to stand beside his burnt offering while he goes to meet the LORD at that spot. The command leaves Balak fixed in place with the rulers of Moab, still positioned at the seven altars built on the head of Pisgah. The LORD meets Balaam there and places a word directly in his mouth, then sends him back with the instruction to speak what he has received. Balaam returns to find Balak unchanged in his stance beside the offering. Balak’s first words are a direct question about what the LORD has spoken. The exchange keeps the focus on the source of the message rather than on any adjustment Balak might hope to achieve by moving to a new vantage point. The same sacrificial setting that framed the first encounter now frames the second, yet the LORD again supplies the content without reference to Balak’s stated desire for a curse. Balak’s question shows he still expects the word to come through Balaam, even after the earlier oracle failed to produce the result he wanted.

God Will Not Revoke Blessing23:18-20

Balaam opens his address by calling Balak to attention with the words "Rise, Balak, and hear; listen to me, son of Zippor." The command draws the Moabite king away from any hope that a new location or fresh sacrifices might yet produce a curse. Balaam then states directly that God is not a man that he should lie, nor a son of man that he should repent. These negations place the divine character beyond the fickleness that marks human speech and decision. The following questions sharpen the claim: has he spoken and will he not do it, or spoken and will he not fulfill it? Each question expects the answer that God’s word moves without fail toward its intended end. Balaam concludes the movement by declaring "Behold, I have received blessing and he has blessed, and I will not revoke it." The blessing already received cannot be withdrawn because its source remains constant. The statement anchors the reliability of the oracle that follows, showing that what Balaam has already received from the LORD will stand unchanged.

No Iniquity Seen in Israel23:21-24

He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, nor has he seen trouble in Israel. The oracle opens by declaring what the LORD does not observe when he looks at the people. In place of any such finding, the LORD his God is with him, and the shout of a king is among them. That presence is then traced to the exodus: God brings them out of Egypt and stands to them like the horns of a wild ox. The same divine action that once delivered them now supplies their ongoing power.

Because no divination operates in Jacob and no divination in Israel, the oracle turns to what will be said about them. At this time the question will be asked of Jacob and of Israel what God has done. The final image shows the result of that divine work. A people rises like a lion and lifts itself like a lion. It will not lie down until it devours the prey and drinks the blood of the slain. The description moves from the LORD’s unclouded view of the people to their protected advance that stops only when the task is finished.

Balak's Command and Balaam's Reply23:25-26

Balak’s order comes at once after the second oracle ends. He tells Balaam, “Neither curse him nor bless him.” The command tries to silence both the negative word he wanted and the positive word he has now received. By forbidding blessing as well as curse, Balak shows he will accept no further speech from Balaam on the matter.

Balaam’s answer returns to what he has already said at the start of their dealings. He asks, “Did I not tell you that I must do whatever the LORD speaks?” The reply does not argue or negotiate. It simply recalls the limit Balaam placed on himself from the beginning: he can only repeat the word the LORD places in his mouth. The exchange leaves Balak without any remaining lever. He has changed the location, repeated the sacrifices, and now tries to restrict the content itself, yet the constraint on Balaam stays the same. The LORD’s word, once given, continues to stand outside Balak’s control.

Notes accompany the Anselm Project Bible, an AI translation from the original languages. Tap any verse above for the committee's word-level decisions.

Tap a verse