27
1 Chronicles

Heads of the King’s Household and Provisions

1 Chronicles 27:25-34
25And Azmaveth son of Adiel was in charge of the treasures of the king, and Jonathan son of Uzziah was in charge of the treasures in the land, in the cities, in the villages, and in the towers. 26And Ezri son of Chelub was in charge of those who did the work of the land for the service of the land. 27And Shimei the Ramathite was in charge of the vineyards, and Zabdi the Shiphmite was in charge of what was in the vineyards for the treasures of the wine. 28And over the olives and the sycamores that were in the Shephelah was Baal-hanan the Gederite, and over the treasures of the oil was Joash. 29And over the cattle that pastured in the Sharon was Shitrai the Sharonite, and Shaphat son of Adlai was in charge of the cattle in the Valley of Achor. 30And Obil the Ishmaelite was in charge of the camels, and Jehdeiah the Meronothite was in charge of the donkeys. 31And Jaziz the Hagri was in charge of the flock. All these were the rulers of the property that belonged to King David. 32And Jonathan, David's uncle, served as an adviser, a man of understanding, and he was the secretary; and Jehiel son of the Hachmonite was with the sons of the king. 33And Ahithophel served as an adviser to the king, and Hushai the Archite was a neighbor of the king. 34And after Ahithophel came Jehoiada son of Benaiah and Abiathar, and Joab was the commander of the army for the king.

Key words in this passage

In this passage

People

Cross-references

Study notes

David's royal holdings required careful division of labor. One man guarded the central treasures while another tracked stores dispersed through towns and towers. Separate officials directed field work, vineyards and their wine, olive groves and oil, cattle in distinct pastures, and herds of camels, donkeys, and sheep. The list then names advisers and attendants close to the king, including his uncle as secretary and counselor, men who attended the royal sons, and a sequence of counselors ending with the army commander. These appointments map the material and personal resources that sustained the court, each tied to a named individual responsible for a defined portion of the kingdom's wealth and counsel.

What is Heads of the King’s Household and Provisions about?

These verses list the men David placed over his royal stores and lands. Azmaveth son of Adiel kept the king’s treasures, while Jonathan son of Uzziah watched the stores scattered through cities, villages, and towers. Ezri son of Chelub directed field labor. Shimei the Ramathite oversaw vineyards and Zabdi the Shiphmite guarded their wine. Baal-hanan the Gederite managed olives and sycamores in the Shephelah, and Joash held the oil. Shitrai the Sharonite and Shaphat son of Adlai watched the cattle in Sharon and the Valley of Achor. Obil the Ishmaelite cared for camels, Jehdeiah the Meronothite for donkeys, and Jaziz the Hagri for flocks. The list then turns to advisers: Jonathan, David’s uncle, served as secretary and counselor, Jehiel attended the royal sons, Ahithophel and Hushai gave counsel, and after Ahithophel came Jehoiada son of Benaiah and Abiathar, with Joab commanding the army.

The passage therefore supplies the final names in the administrative roster that runs through chapter 27. It shows how David kept track of produce, livestock, and counsel across the kingdom’s varied regions. These appointments stand immediately before David gathers the leaders to hand over plans for the temple, so the verses mark the settled order of the present reign at the moment it begins to shift toward what comes next.

Where does this passage sit in 1 Chronicles?

These verses sit directly after the civil officials listed in 27:16-24 and complete the administrative survey that began with the military divisions in 27:1-15. The Chronicler moves without interruption from army commanders and tribal overseers to the men who managed the king’s stores, fields, vineyards, and livestock, then to the circle of advisers who stood closest to David. This steady widening of scope shows the kingdom’s internal order extending from battlefield to household.

The transition into chapter 28 is equally direct. Once the property managers and counselors are named, the narrative turns to David’s public assembly of leaders for the temple project. The final mention of Joab as army commander in 27:34 supplies a quiet link back to the military lists earlier in the chapter, yet the emphasis now rests on the settled structures that will support Solomon’s reign rather than on campaigns.

Within the larger book, the same pattern of exhaustive naming appears in the Levitical and priestly arrangements of chapters 23–26. Here the focus narrows to royal property and counsel, but the method remains consistent: each role receives a named individual and a precise sphere of responsibility. The result is a portrait of David’s reign that is fully staffed and ready for transfer, with no loose ends left in the administrative record before the temple charge begins.

How is the passage structured?

The verses open with a chain of appointments that begins at the center of royal wealth and moves outward. Azmaveth holds the king’s own treasures while Jonathan son of Uzziah manages the same kind of stores once they are dispersed across cities, villages, and towers. Ezri then takes charge of the labor that produces the crops, after which the list narrows to specific crops and their processed goods: Shimei over vineyards and Zabdi over the wine stores, Baal-hanan over olives and sycamores in the Shephelah and Joash over the oil. The pattern continues with livestock assigned to named regions and men—Shitrai in Sharon, Shaphat in the Valley of Achor, Obil with camels, Jehdeiah with donkeys, Jaziz with flocks—until verse 31 gathers every name under the single heading of rulers over David’s property.

At that point the account changes register. The next three verses turn from land and goods to the people who stand closest to the king. Jonathan, identified as David’s uncle, appears first as both adviser and secretary; Jehiel is placed with the royal sons. Ahithophel and Hushai follow as counselors, yet the text immediately notes that Jehoiada and Abiathar come after Ahithophel, while Joab remains commander of the army. The shift is marked by the absence of any further summary sentence; the list simply stops once the military office is named. This produces two distinct blocks—one extended catalog of stewards arranged by commodity and place, the other a compact sequence of court roles that ends with the army—joined only by the movement from property to persons.

What is the historical background?

The list names officials responsible for the king’s stored wealth and for the produce of particular districts. In the ancient Near East a ruler’s power depended on reliable oversight of grain, oil, wine, and livestock, since these goods supplied the court, supported military campaigns, and funded building projects. The Chronicler therefore records separate supervisors for the central treasury, for produce kept in outlying towns and towers, and for the labor that worked the fields. Such specialization reflects a developed royal bureaucracy rather than simple household management.

Several place names point to the agricultural zones that fed the kingdom. The Sharon plain offered rich pasture for cattle, while the Shephelah, the low hills west of the Judean highlands, suited olive groves and sycamore orchards. The Valley of Achor lay east of Jericho and provided another stretch of grazing land. By assigning men from these very regions—Shitrai the Sharonite, Baal-hanan the Gederite—the king placed local knowledge over local resources.

The final verses turn from property to persons. Jonathan is identified as David’s uncle and described as both adviser and secretary, while Ahithophel and Hushai are listed simply as advisers. The term “adviser” here covers men who offered counsel on policy and who kept records. After Ahithophel the text names Jehoiada son of Benaiah and Abiathar, then notes Joab’s command of the army. The sequence suggests an inner circle that combined family ties, scribal skill, and military authority.

Foreign or non-Israelite names appear among the stewards—Obil the Ishmaelite, Jaziz the Hagri—indicating that David drew administrators from groups that had entered his service. Their presence alongside Judahite and Benjaminite officials shows that practical competence, not tribal origin alone, determined appointment to these posts.

What does this passage teach about God?

The lists in these verses portray a kingdom sustained by ordered human oversight of fields, flocks, and stores. Azmaveth, Jonathan son of Uzziah, Ezri, Shimei, Zabdi, Baal-hanan, Joash, Shitrai, Shaphat, Obil, Jehdeiah, and Jaziz each receive charge over specific portions of what belonged to King David. Their appointments imply that the land’s produce—treasures in cities and towers, grain from the fields, wine from vineyards, oil from olives and sycamores, cattle in Sharon and the Valley of Achor, camels, donkeys, and flocks—does not manage itself. God’s gift of territory requires attentive stewards who know the difference between vineyards and their wine stores, between pasture in one valley and pasture in another.

The same passage places advisers alongside these property rulers. Jonathan, David’s uncle, serves as secretary and counselor; Jehiel attends the royal sons; Ahithophel and Hushai give counsel; Jehoiada and Abiathar follow; and Joab commands the army. Material provision and wise guidance stand together as necessary for the king’s household. The text does not separate the two tasks. Without the produce of the land the court cannot function; without counsel the king cannot direct the army or the sons. Both forms of service therefore belong to the same divine ordering of the realm.

The repeated phrase “in charge of” underscores human responsibility rather than divine micromanagement. Each official acts within a defined sphere, yet all answer to the one king whose property they guard. This arrangement reflects the conviction that God grants Israel both land and leadership, then holds appointed persons accountable for the care of both. The inclusion of an Ishmaelite over camels and a Hagrite over flocks further shows that service to David’s house draws in people from outside Israel’s tribes, extending the reach of ordered stewardship beyond ethnic boundaries.

Finally, the list ends with Joab as commander of the army. Military strength secures the fields and herds already named. The theological claim is not that abundance arrives without defense, but that God supplies both the resources and the structures—administrative, advisory, and martial—by which those resources remain under royal care. The verses therefore present a picture of covenant life in which divine blessing meets concrete human administration.

What are the interpretive difficulties?

The list names two men called Jonathan. One, son of Uzziah, oversees scattered royal stores; the other, David’s uncle, serves as secretary and adviser. The Chronicler gives no signal that these are the same person, and the differing patronymics and duties point to two distinct officials. Readers must therefore keep the two figures separate when tracing David’s administration.

Ahithophel appears simply as one of the king’s advisers. The account supplies no hint of his later counsel against David or of his suicide. That silence leaves open whether the writer assumes readers already know the fuller story from Samuel or whether he deliberately sets such episodes aside to focus on the ordered structure of the kingdom.

The phrase “after Ahithophel came Jehoiada son of Benaiah and Abiathar” records a change in personnel without explaining its cause. Nothing in the verses indicates whether Ahithophel retired, died, or fell from favor. The text records only the sequence of names.

Finally, the closing notice that Joab remained commander of the army stands without reference to his earlier killings or to his support of Adonijah. The passage therefore presents the household and its officers as a completed, functioning system. It does not address how long any of these arrangements lasted or how they fared once Solomon took the throne.

Movement by movement

Overseers of Royal Treasures and Field Labor27:25-26

Azmaveth son of Adiel kept the treasures of the king in one place, while Jonathan son of Uzziah watched the same stores once they were spread through cities, villages, and towers. The two men divide the same task by location, one holding what stayed at the center and the other tracking what had already moved outward. Ezri son of Chelub then stands over those who did the work of the land for the service of the land. His charge reaches behind the stored goods to the labor that produced them. The movement therefore traces royal wealth from its gathered form back to the fields that supplied it. The Chronicler places these three names together before turning to vineyards, olives, and livestock, so the first pair of verses already shows the pattern that will continue: one official for central holdings, another for what is dispersed, and a third for the work that keeps both supplied. Nothing in the wording suggests these men shared their duties or rotated through them; each receives a distinct sphere that belongs to King David.

Managers of Vineyards and Olive Groves27:27-28

Shimei the Ramathite was in charge of the vineyards, and Zabdi the Shiphmite was in charge of what was in the vineyards for the treasures of the wine. The two men divide the work between the living vines and the processed reserves, so that the wine itself receives separate protection once it leaves the press. Baal-hanan the Gederite then receives oversight of the olives and the sycamores that were in the Shephelah, while Joash alone holds the treasures of the oil. The Chronicler records the trees and their fruit in one clause, then shifts the oil to its own supervisor, marking the same distinction between field and storehouse that appeared with the vineyards. These appointments follow directly after Ezri’s direction of field labor, narrowing the list from general cultivation to the specific produce that supplied the court. The Shephelah’s terraced slopes and the Ramathite’s vineyards supplied two staples whose steady yield depended on men who knew both the soil and the storage jars. By naming each official with his district and product, the account shows David’s wealth preserved through precise, localized responsibility rather than a single overseer.

Herdsmen and the Summary of Property Rulers27:29-31

Shitrai the Sharonite oversaw the cattle that pastured in the Sharon, while Shaphat son of Adlai held charge over the cattle in the Valley of Achor. The two regions lie at some distance from each other, one a fertile coastal plain and the other an inland valley, so the appointments keep the herds under distinct local supervision. Obil the Ishmaelite then managed the camels, Jehdeiah the Meronothite the donkeys, and Jaziz the Hagri the flock. Each official receives a single sentence that names both the man and the animals placed under him, and the ethnic or geographic labels attached to four of the five names suggest the Chronicler drew the information from an existing administrative record. The paragraph ends by declaring that all these were the rulers of the property that belonged to King David. That summary sentence reaches back across the entire list of storekeepers, field workers, vine and olive managers, and now the herdsmen, treating every named supervisor as part of one coordinated body responsible for the king’s material holdings.

Personal Advisers and Household Attendants27:32-33

Jonathan, David's uncle, served as an adviser, a man of understanding, and he was the secretary. The double description sets his work apart from the single titles given to most other officials, linking counsel directly to the keeping of records inside the royal household. Jehiel son of the Hachmonite stayed with the sons of the king, an assignment that placed one attendant inside the family quarters rather than at the council table. Ahithophel served as an adviser to the king with no further detail supplied about his counsel or standing, while Hushai the Archite receives mention only as a neighbor of the king. That single word points to daily closeness without naming any formal duty. These four men close the administrative survey that began with commanders of divisions and continued through the supervisors of fields, vineyards, and flocks. Their placement shows the structure of oversight reaching from outlying estates inward until it touches the king and his children. The Chronicler records each name by the task assigned and offers no comment on later events or relationships among them.

Later Officials and the Army Commander27:34

The verse states that after Ahithophel came Jehoiada son of Benaiah and Abiathar, and Joab was the commander of the army for the king. This phrasing marks a change among the advisers without explaining the reason or timing. Earlier in the chapter Jonathan, David’s uncle, already served as an adviser and secretary, while Hushai stood as a neighbor to the king. The arrival of Jehoiada and Abiathar therefore extends the circle of counsel rather than replacing it outright. Abiathar’s name recalls his long service as priest under David, yet the text assigns him no title here beyond the advisory role. Joab’s position receives the final clause, stated simply as commander of the army. The Chronicler has already listed military divisions under their own heads in 27:1-15, so this closing reference to Joab gathers the entire administrative picture under one figure who holds field command. No further detail appears about how these later advisers interacted with the property managers named in 27:25-31 or with the tribal officers in 27:16-24. The account leaves the relationship between the two advisory pairs and the army command unstated, presenting only the fact of their appointments in succession.

Notes accompany the Anselm Project Bible, an AI translation from the original languages. Tap any verse above for the committee's word-level decisions.

Tap a verse