The Anselm Project Bible · The Crux Registry

John 1:34, the Son of God, or the Chosen One?

John 1:34 has both readings: the Son of God and God's Chosen One. Nestle-Aland 28 prints Son; the SBL Greek New Testament (Holmes) and the APB print Chosen One.

ὁ ἐκλεκτός
ho eklektos, the Chosen One
ὁ υἱός
ho huios, the Son
The Baptist's climactic testimony, and the manuscripts split between the title every scribe expected and the one almost none would invent.
IThe Text

The APB text at this verse

And I have seen and have testified that this is the chosen one of God.”
John 1:34 (source numbering) · Anselm Project Bible
IIThe Witnesses

The manuscripts, editions, and versions

SBL Greek New Testament (Holmes)
Holmes · critical edition, 2010
ἐκλεκτὸς, the Chosen One
The SBLGNT prints the minority reading (with the WH margin); the NIV footnotes it. Holmes prints the minority reading, Chosen One, with support from the WH margin. SBLGNT apparatus (Faithlife, CC BY 4.0)
Nestle-Aland 28
NA28 · critical edition, 2012
υἱὸς, the Son
WH, Tregelles, NA28, and the Byzantine text read Son. NA28 prints Son, agreeing with WH, Tregelles, and the Byzantine text. SBLGNT apparatus (Faithlife, CC BY 4.0)
Papyrus 5 and Sinaiticus (first hand)
P5 ℵ* · manuscripts, 3rd-4th century A.D.
ὁ ἐκλεκτός ho eklektos, the Chosen One
Early Egyptian witnesses carry “Chosen One”, the reading harmonization would erase. These early Egyptian witnesses preserve Chosen One, the reading that harmonization toward Son could erase. NT Virtual Manuscript Room (INTF)
supports if “chosen one”supports if “son”
IIIThe Committee

The committee record at this verse

The APB is translated by a committee of language models that works blind. The translators are never told they are translating the Bible, never given a book name or a verse number, and never shown the witnesses listed above. Where the manuscripts disagree, the choice between readings is made before translation by the same kind of translator working the same way: it sees the competing readings and the witnesses by age and class, but never a reference or a manuscript name. There are 14,877 such places. For APB 4.0 every one was decided again in October 2026. GPT-6.1 Sol decided every one first. Claude Fable 5.1, from another model family, decided 2,483 of them second, including every place where the first translator left the base text. A departure from the base text needs both translators to agree and the first to be at least 0.8 confident. There is no third translator, so the base text stands when the two disagree. APB 4.0 is translated over those decisions. Whatever was done at this verse was done on the language and the evidence alone, and the record is public.

Textual decisiondecided for release 4.0one translator, working blind

“The base text reads υἱὸς. The copies also carry the omission [greek majuscule; greek papyrus; early greek manuscript tradition]; the committee kept the base text. Retain the default chiefly because of its stronger early support.”

“The base text reads ἐκλεκτὸς. The copies also carry υἱὸς [greek majuscule; greek papyrus; early greek manuscript tradition; later majority tradition]; the committee kept the base text. Retain the default provisionally.”

Committee recordaudit verdict: clean

The APB 4.0 committee retained the Chosen One provisionally. Its decision note states: "The base text reads ἐκλεκτὸς. The copies also carry υἱὸς" and concludes: "Retain the default provisionally." GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) was the first translator and kept the base text; the unit did not go to a second translator. The committee's printed text reads "this is the chosen one of God."

IVThe Arguments

The argument for each reading

If “Chosen One”

The case for the Chosen One begins with Papyrus 5 and Sinaiticus (first hand). They preserve this title in early Egyptian witnesses. The SBL Greek New Testament (Holmes) prints it, and the WH margin also supports it. This reading therefore has both manuscript support and a place in editorial judgment, despite being the minority reading.

The copying argument concerns familiarity: a scribe could replace the less expected Chosen One with the familiar Son. That possibility helps explain how this reading might have receded. It does not establish that such a replacement occurred.

If “Son”

The case for the Son rests on its support across the editions and textual traditions identified in the apparatus. Nestle-Aland 28 prints it, as do WH and Tregelles; the Byzantine text also reads Son. This agreement gives the reading a broader editorial and traditional footing than the minority alternative.

Its familiarity allows competing explanations. It could have encouraged scribes to substitute Son for Chosen One, but familiarity alone cannot establish substitution. The title could also have been preserved through copying. With this reading, the Baptist's climactic testimony identifies Jesus as God's Son.

The uncertainty concerns which title stood in the Baptist's testimony: Chosen One or Son. Early support for Chosen One and broader support for Son leave room for different judgments about transmission. Both readings retain the Baptist's declaration that he has seen and testified. The variant changes his title for Jesus at this point; it does not by itself settle doctrines that rest on many passages.

VThe Registry

See it in the Bible