The Anselm Project Bible · The Crux Registry

Genesis 4:8, the words Cain never says

In Genesis 4:8, Cain invites Abel to the field in the Samaritan Pentateuch, with similar invitations in the Septuagint and Vulgate; the Masoretic Text says he spoke but gives no words.

נלכה השדה
nelkhah hassadeh, “let us go out to the field”
ויאמר… ויהי
vayyomer… vayhi, “he said”, and nothing follows
The Hebrew says “Cain said to his brother Abel”, and never says what. Several ancient witnesses supply the sentence.
IThe Text

The APB text at this verse

And Cain spoke to Abel his brother. And when they were in the field, Cain rose against Abel his brother and killed him.
Genesis 4:8 (source numbering) · Anselm Project Bible
IIThe Witnesses

The manuscripts, editions, and versions

Masoretic Text (Westminster Leningrad Codex)
MT · codex A.D. 1008; tradition centuries older
ויאמר קין אל הבל אחיו vayyomer qayin el-hevel aḥiv, and Cain said to Abel his brother —
The verb of speech has no speech after it; the narrative jumps straight to the field. The speech verb has no spoken sentence after it; the narrative proceeds directly to the field. Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (WLC)
Samaritan Pentateuch
SP · independent Hebrew tradition
נלכה השדה nelkhah hassadeh, let us go to the field
Supplies the missing sentence in Hebrew. This independent Hebrew tradition includes the invitation to the field in Hebrew. Samaritan Pentateuch (dt-ucph/sp)
Septuagint
LXX · translation, c. 3rd century B.C.
Διέλθωμεν εἰς τὸ πεδίον Dielthōmen eis to pedion, let us go through into the plain
The Greek supplies the sentence. The Greek translation includes an invitation to go through into the plain. Septuagint (Rahlfs-Hanhart, academic-bible.com)
Vulgate
Vg · translation, c. A.D. 400
egrediamur foras, let us go outside
Jerome also supplies the sentence. The Latin wording gives Cain an invitation to go outside. Biblia Sacra Vulgata (academic-bible.com)
supports if the words belongsupports if the silence is original
IIIThe Committee

The committee record at this verse

The APB is translated by a committee of language models that works blind. The translators are never told they are translating the Bible, never given a book name or a verse number, and never shown the witnesses listed above. Where the manuscripts disagree, the choice between readings is made before translation by the same kind of translator working the same way: it sees the competing readings and the witnesses by age and class, but never a reference or a manuscript name. There are 14,877 such places. For APB 4.0 every one was decided again in October 2026. GPT-6.1 Sol decided every one first. Claude Fable 5.1, from another model family, decided 2,483 of them second, including every place where the first translator left the base text. A departure from the base text needs both translators to agree and the first to be at least 0.8 confident. There is no third translator, so the base text stands when the two disagree. APB 4.0 is translated over those decisions. Whatever was done at this verse was done on the language and the evidence alone, and the record is public.

Textual decisiondecided for release 4.0two translators, working blind

“The base text reads ויאמר קין אל־הבל אחיו. The copies also carry ויאמר קין אל־הבל אחיו נלכה השדה [hebrew manuscript attestation; independent hebrew recension; ancient greek version; latin version]; the committee kept the base text. Both readers preferred the other wording, but the first reader's confidence was under the committee's floor of 0.8, so the base text stands.”

Committee recordaudit verdict: None

The committee's decision retained the base text: "the committee kept the base text." GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) was the first translator, and Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) was the second translator. Both preferred the wording with the invitation, but the first translator's confidence fell below the committee's threshold of 0.8. The APB therefore prints "And Cain spoke to Abel his brother." It then moves to the brothers being in the field without giving Cain a spoken sentence.

IVThe Arguments

The argument for each reading

If the words belong

The Samaritan Pentateuch gives Cain an invitation to go to the field. The Septuagint also includes an invitation, phrased as going into the plain, and the Vulgate has an invitation to go outside. These witnesses support a spoken sentence where the Masoretic Text moves directly from the speech introduction to the next event. The Samaritan Pentateuch gives this reading support within an independent Hebrew tradition as well as alongside the translations. With the invitation present, Cain proposes the movement that precedes the killing. The witnesses differ in their wording, so their agreement supports the presence of an invitation without establishing one identical form across all three.

If the silence is original

The Masoretic Text introduces Cain's speech but gives no words for him to say. Its narrative moves straight to the brothers being in the field. This provides a concrete basis for retaining the shorter reading: the gap belongs to the wording of this Hebrew witness. Retaining it also preserves uncertainty about the content of Cain's speech. An invitation would connect the speech introduction with the location of the next event, but that connection alone cannot establish that the sentence belongs. The shorter reading leaves the transition unexplained while still reporting that Cain rose against Abel and killed him.

The witnesses leave uncertainty about whether an invitation dropped out or entered the text. Their readings establish the difference but do not settle how it arose. The variant affects whether Cain explicitly proposes going to the field. The account still places both brothers there and reports that Cain kills Abel. Cain's responsibility for the killing does not depend on the disputed sentence.

VThe Registry

See it in the Bible