The Anselm Project Bible · The Crux Registry

1 Samuel 6:19, did God strike down 50,070 men?

1 Samuel 6:19 has both a reading with seventy and fifty thousand men, which can be read as 50,070, and a reading with seventy alone. The APB retains both figures in the account of men struck for looking into the ark.

שבעים איש
shiv'im ish, seventy men
שבעים איש חמשים אלף איש
shiv'im ish chamishim elef ish, seventy men — fifty thousand men
The received Hebrew stacks two numbers side by side with no “and” between them; the town could scarcely have held fifty thousand.
IThe Text

The APB text at this verse

And he struck among the men of Beth-shemesh because they looked into the ark of the LORD. And he struck seventy men, fifty thousand men, among the people. And the people mourned because the LORD had struck the people with a great blow.
1 Samuel 6:19 (source numbering) · Anselm Project Bible
IIThe Witnesses

The manuscripts, editions, and versions

Masoretic Text (Westminster Leningrad Codex)
MT · codex A.D. 1008; tradition centuries older
שבעים איש חמשים אלף איש shiv'im ish chamishim elef ish, seventy men, fifty thousand men
The received text carries both numbers, joined by nothing, grammar so strained that translators have argued over it ever since. The two quantities stand together without a connecting word, leaving their numerical relationship difficult to express. Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (WLC)
Septuagint
LXX · translation, c. 2nd century B.C.
ἑβδομήκοντα ἄνδρας καὶ πεντήκοντα χιλιάδας ἀνδρῶν, seventy men, fifty thousand men
The Greek keeps both figures but supplies the missing “and.” The Greek preserves both quantities and adds a conjunction to connect them. Septuagint (Rahlfs-Hanhart, academic-bible.com)
Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews VI
Josephus · history, 1st century A.D.
seventy men, seventy — no larger number
Retelling the story, Josephus counts only seventy struck down, as if his text of Samuel lacked the fifty thousand. Josephus gives seventy in a retelling; his smaller count suggests, but does not establish, that his text omitted fifty thousand. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews (Project Gutenberg)
supports if seventysupports if 50,070
IIIThe Committee

The committee record at this verse

The APB is translated by a committee of language models that works blind. The translators are never told they are translating the Bible, never given a book name or a verse number, and never shown the witnesses listed above. Where the manuscripts disagree, the choice between readings is made before translation by the same kind of translator working the same way: it sees the competing readings and the witnesses by age and class, but never a reference or a manuscript name. There are 14,877 such places. For APB 4.0 every one was decided again in October 2026. GPT-6.1 Sol decided every one first. Claude Fable 5.1, from another model family, decided 2,483 of them second, including every place where the first translator left the base text. A departure from the base text needs both translators to agree and the first to be at least 0.8 confident. There is no third translator, so the base text stands when the two disagree. APB 4.0 is translated over those decisions. Whatever was done at this verse was done on the language and the evidence alone, and the record is public.

Committee recordseventy men, fifty thousand menaudit verdict: cleanAPB 4.0 committee

“Both adjacent quantities are retained without imposing an unstated numerical relationship.”

The APB committee's printed text retains both quantities: "seventy men, fifty thousand men". Its note states: "Both adjacent quantities are retained without imposing an unstated numerical relationship." The committee therefore preserves the two figures separately rather than expressing them as a single total of 50,070. Its record gives no further explanation for retaining the larger number.
IVThe Arguments

The argument for each reading

If seventy

The case for seventy rests on Josephus and the difficulty of the longer Hebrew wording. Josephus, in Antiquities of the Jews VI, counts seventy people struck down when he retells the story. His account therefore supports the smaller number, though a retelling does not establish the exact wording of the text he used.

The received Hebrew places seventy men beside fifty thousand men without a connecting word. The larger figure also strains the scale of a town that could scarcely have held fifty thousand. Reading seventy alone removes both difficulties. Those difficulties give reasons to consider the shorter reading, but they do not establish how the longer wording arose.

If 50,070

The case for retaining both numbers rests on the Masoretic Text and the Septuagint. The Hebrew contains seventy men followed by fifty thousand men. The Greek also preserves both figures and adds a conjunction between them. The larger number thus appears in both the received Hebrew and the Greek translation.

Retaining both figures preserves wording supported by these two witnesses. Their agreement on the numbers does not remove the difficulty of relating them: the Hebrew leaves that relationship unstated, while the Greek supplies a connection. A total of 50,070 combines the quantities, but the Hebrew itself places them side by side without an explicit connector.

The relationship between the two Hebrew quantities remains uncertain. Josephus's smaller count does not establish whether his text omitted the larger number or whether his retelling shortened the account. The variant changes the scale of the deaths. It does not change the stated reason for the blow or the people's mourning, and the choice between these numbers alone does not settle a doctrine about divine judgment.

VThe Registry

See it in the Bible