The Anselm Project Bible · The Crux Registry

Job 13:15, “I will hope in him”, or “I have no hope”?

Job 13:15 has both readings: the written Hebrew says “I have no hope”; the marginal reading gives “I will hope in him,” the sense behind “yet will I trust him”. The difference is one letter.

לו
lo (lamed-vav), in him (I will hope)
לא
lo (lamed-alef), not (I have no hope)
Two Hebrew words pronounced identically, one written with vav, one with alef. The scribes wrote one and told readers to say the other.
IThe Text

The APB text at this verse

Look, even if he slays me, I will wait for him; surely I will defend my ways before him.
Job 13:15 (source numbering) · Anselm Project Bible
IIThe Witnesses

The manuscripts, editions, and versions

Masoretic Text (Westminster Leningrad Codex)
MT · codex A.D. 1008; tradition centuries older
לא lo, not, “I have no hope” (as written, ketiv)
The consonantal text has the negative. The consonantal text preserves the negative as the ketiv, the written form. Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (WLC)
Masoretic qere (marginal reading)
Qere · Masoretic apparatus, medieval
לו lo, in him, “I will hope in him”
The Masoretes' own margin instructs the reader to pronounce “in him”, the reading behind the KJV's famous line. The Masoretes' margin instructs the reader to say in him, preserving an expression of hope alongside the written negative. Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (WLC)
supports if the margin (“in him”)supports if the letters (“not”)
IIIThe Committee

The committee record at this verse

The APB is translated by a committee of language models that works blind. The translators are never told they are translating the Bible, never given a book name or a verse number, and never shown the witnesses listed above. Where the manuscripts disagree, the choice between readings is made before translation by the same kind of translator working the same way: it sees the competing readings and the witnesses by age and class, but never a reference or a manuscript name. There are 14,877 such places. For APB 4.0 every one was decided again in October 2026. GPT-6.1 Sol decided every one first. Claude Fable 5.1, from another model family, decided 2,483 of them second, including every place where the first translator left the base text. A departure from the base text needs both translators to agree and the first to be at least 0.8 confident. There is no third translator, so the base text stands when the two disagree. APB 4.0 is translated over those decisions. Whatever was done at this verse was done on the language and the evidence alone, and the record is public.

Textual decisiondecided for release 4.0two translators, working blind

“The base text reads ל֣וֹ. The copies also carry לא [hebrew consonantal tradition]; the committee kept the base text. The case is close: the written negative is the harder wording, while the read form suits the verb and the line that follows. The committee keeps the default with low confidence.”

Committee recordaudit verdict: None

The committee kept the base reading in him with low confidence. Its textual note says: "The case is close: the written negative is the harder wording, while the read form suits the verb and the line that follows." GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) was the first translator; Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) was the second translator. The committee's printed text renders the phrase "I will wait for him" and retains Job's declaration that he will defend his ways before him.

IVThe Arguments

The argument for each reading

If the margin (“in him”)

The Masoretic qere directs the reader to say לו, meaning in him. This gives the line an expression of hope even in the face of death. Its support comes from the marginal reading preserved alongside the written negative: the scribes recorded an instruction to read the words this way.

The APB's textual decision identifies two reasons to retain this reading: it suits the verb and the line that follows. The APB prints a willingness to wait for him, followed by Job's resolve to defend his ways before him. Reading A therefore places hope and self-defense together. The committee nevertheless describes the choice as close and retains it with low confidence.

If the letters (“not”)

The Masoretic Text (Westminster Leningrad Codex) has לא in its consonantal text. This is the negative and gives the sense I have no hope. Reading B follows the written form, or ketiv. Its support lies in the letters preserved in the text itself.

The APB's textual decision calls the written negative the harder wording. On this reading, Job's resolve to defend his ways stands alongside an absence of hope. The change affects how his stance toward death is heard: his determination to speak remains, while the declaration of hope does not. The marginal instruction preserves the competing reading, so the written negative and the instruction to read in him must both be accounted for.

The uncertainty concerns the relationship between the written negative and the marginal instruction to read in him. Both belong to the Masoretic transmission, and the committee records low confidence in its choice. The variant changes whether Job expresses hope in this line. His resolve to defend his ways remains in either reading, and the APB's following line still calls him Job's salvation. No doctrine about faith or suffering can be settled by this choice alone.

VThe Registry

See it in the Bible