The Anselm Project Bible · The Crux Registry

1 Timothy 3:16, “God was manifested”, or “he who was manifested”?

1 Timothy 3:16 has both a “God” reading and a “who” reading in the listed evidence. The difference lies between ΟΣ and ΘΣ, two forms separated by small added strokes of ink.

ΟΣ
hos, who (was manifested in the flesh)
ΘΣ
theos, God (was manifested in the flesh)
In uncial script the difference between ΟΣ (“who”) and the sacred abbreviation ΘΣ (“God”) is two small strokes of ink, strokes that several manuscripts show added by later hands.
IThe Text

The APB text at this verse

And undeniably the mystery of godliness is great: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.
1 Timothy 3:16 (source numbering) · Anselm Project Bible
IIThe Witnesses

The manuscripts, editions, and versions

Nestle-Aland 28
NA28 · critical edition, 2012
Ὃς, who — a relative pronoun
WH, Tregelles, and NA28 all print the pronoun. NA28, a critical edition dated 2012, reads Ὃς and identifies it as a relative pronoun. SBLGNT apparatus (Faithlife, CC BY 4.0)
Robinson-Pierpont Byzantine Textform
RP · Byzantine majority edition, 2005
θεὸς, God
The Byzantine text reads God, the KJV's “God was manifest in the flesh.” The Robinson-Pierpont Byzantine Textform, dated 2005, reads θεὸς and supports reading B. SBLGNT apparatus (Faithlife, CC BY 4.0)
Codex Alexandrinus (A)
A · manuscript, 5th century A.D.
ΟΣ hos, who (original ink)
Under examination, the codex's original reading is the pronoun; the tell-tale strokes making it “God” are later touch-ups. Codex Alexandrinus, dated 5th century A.D., has ΟΣ in its original ink; the strokes for “God” are later touch-ups. NT Virtual Manuscript Room (INTF)
supports if “who”supports if “god”
IIIThe Committee

The committee record at this verse

The APB's translation committee works blind: it is never told it is translating the Bible, never given a book name or a verse number, and it never sees the witnesses above. Since revision 3.5, the places where the manuscripts disagree are decided before translation by three readers, Grok 4.3, GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Fable 5.1, who see the readings and the witnesses by age and class but never a reference or a manuscript name. Whatever was done at this verse was done on the language and the evidence alone, and the record is public.

Textual decisionrelease apb_v3_5three blind readers

“The base text reads ὃς. The copies also carry the omission [later majority tradition]; the committee kept the base text. The early and independent attestation of ὃς is decisive; the internal evidence is consistent with that conclusion.”

“The base text reads Ὃς. The copies also carry θεὸς [later majority tradition]; the committee kept the base text. Retain the default wording. Its much earlier attestation and its ability to explain the smoother alternative agree.”

Committee recordaudit verdict: flagged

At this crux, the APB 3.5 textual decision retained the base wording Ὃς. Its note states: “The base text reads Ὃς. The copies also carry θεὸς [later majority tradition]; the committee kept the base text. Retain the default wording. Its much earlier attestation and its ability to explain the smoother alternative agree.” The three readers worked blind, seeing witnesses only by class and date. The pericope audit verdict is “flagged,” and no matching rationale note is recorded.

IVThe Arguments

The argument for each reading

If “who”

Reading A is the pronoun ΟΣ, represented in the apparatus as Ὃς and translated “who.” Nestle-Aland 28, a critical edition dated 2012, prints Ὃς; the apparatus also places WH and Treg with that reading. Codex Alexandrinus provides a manuscript-level detail: its original ink reads ΟΣ. The packet reports that the strokes which make the form read “God” are later touch-ups. The APB printed text likewise begins the verse’s sequence with “He was manifested in the flesh.” On this presentation, the reading supplies a relative pronoun before the six clauses that follow.

If “God”

Reading B is ΘΣ, represented in the apparatus as θεὸς and translated “God.” The Robinson-Pierpont Byzantine Textform, a Byzantine majority edition dated 2005, reads θεὸς. The visual question is unusually compact: in uncial script, ΟΣ and the sacred abbreviation ΘΣ differ by two small strokes of ink. The packet also reports that several manuscripts show such strokes added by later hands. Reading B therefore gives the opening clause the explicit subject “God,” rather than the pronoun found in reading A.

The packet identifies a small visual difference with a substantial change in the stated subject: “who” or “God.” It also records later touch-ups in Codex Alexandrinus and competing printed editions. The six following clauses in the APB printed text are not identified here as a disputed unit. This packet supplies no broader doctrinal conclusion; doctrines commonly draw on many passages.

VQuestions

Common questions

Does 1 Timothy 3:16 say God was manifest in the flesh?

The listed evidence contains both readings: θεὸς, “God,” in RP and Ὃς, “who,” in NA28 and the original ink of Codex Alexandrinus.

What is the difference between ΟΣ and ΘΣ?

In uncial script, the packet describes the difference as two small strokes of ink. It reports that several manuscripts show those strokes added by later hands.

What does the APB printed text say at 1 Timothy 3:16?

Its printed text reads: “And undeniably the mystery of godliness is great: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

VIThe Registry

Related entries

Witness readings for critical editions are quoted from the SBLGNT apparatus (CC BY 4.0); Hebrew text from the Westminster Leningrad Codex (Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible). Readings of ancient manuscripts and versions are cited as published scholarly fact with their sources linked above. The page does not declare which reading is original.

The registry gives no verdict

The registry does not say which reading is original. Each page lists the witnesses, shows what the committee did with the same text, and leaves the judgment to the reader.